🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."